|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1069
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 11:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'd like POS updates too.
Something like 'unified POS storage' would make my day. Having to shuffle stuff between arrays is a PITA FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1069
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 12:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Eliniale wrote:CCP, I would like to point out that the support so far amounts to 1% of eve's daily logins
Psst. While I don't want to weaken the point, that's 450 or so comments. the maximum concurrent user count is at 54k or so per day. The number of people actually logging in is higher. we don't stay connected 23.5 hours a day. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1073
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
While it's not simple, what I want to see as a minimum is:
Allow anyone in a player corp to launch a POS, anywhere in a system, then lock down who can use it/access it/unanchor it to specific lists of players (one for each). A player level resource, not a Corp level one.
Sure, there's lots of other things that would be nice (unified storage for one) but that's my main problem with it. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1078
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 20:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
As a complete aside, how about a POS module which can repair ships?
Ideally, I think, with something that can be bought/looted from NPCs. (adds another isk sink) FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1080
|
Posted - 2013.01.18 17:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
I''d like to see a number on how many active POS there are in game. Ideally split between wormholes, high, null and low.
Along with the number of moons in each (where something can be anchored. I don't care about moons in a 1.0 system). FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1247
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 10:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
You can thank me (in the future) for the changes mentioned. I reached back with the magical powers I will aquire when elected to CSM 8, to change CCPs roadmap.
You have to elect me now, or you'll create a time paradox that will destroy everything
More seriously, sounding good Hopefully the fixes knock off the most annoying edges. Steve Ronuken for CSM 8 Handy tools and SDE conversions Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3170
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 23:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Celly S wrote:as to not be forgotten in the midst of fanfest and Kronos changes...
Bump
If you note what was said by Seagull, they have plans. Kronos was some groundwork. Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4069
|
Posted - 2014.09.21 12:03:10 -
[8] - Quote
I just wanted to drop in and say:
Really, don't worry about this being forgotten about
And can people let a CSM member they 'trust' know what they use POS for, along with things like a breakdown of how you would fit a POS for a particular purpose, and what kind of numbers you have of them?
For example: You might have a POS at a moon, that has a moon miner in it. But the actual purpose of the POS is for supercap storage, or maybe staging. It's something that's hard to determine purely from the database, and could lead to skewed numbers.
(We'll pass it on to CCP. Pick a CSM member that you don't think will break your opsec.
Woo! CSM 9!
http://fuzzwork.enterprises/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4069
|
Posted - 2014.09.23 11:47:54 -
[9] - Quote
Balder Verdandi wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote: It's something that's hard to determine purely from the database, and could lead to skewed numbers.
Steve, To be fair it's a poor excuse CCP is using here. Please don't drink the Kool-Aid. Moon mining towers have silos/moon goo mining gear/storage (honestly if you have an R rated moon, you're mining it), cyno beacon towers of course will have a cyno beacon, if you're building ships you'll have a CSAA, if you're making ammo you'll have an assembly array, if you're researching BPO's you're going to have labs. It doesn't take much to figure out what's going on just by looking at a tower. Why is this so difficult for CCP to grasp?
So, how do you determine the difference between a POS used primarily for super cap storage, or staging, which happens to have a moon mining array to help defray costs, from an POS which is there just to mine?
Woo! CSM 9!
http://fuzzwork.enterprises/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4130
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 04:34:57 -
[10] - Quote
Balder Verdandi wrote:Nice seeing two CSM's post about this.
Thank you to both of you. At least someone else higher in the food chain than I realizes there is a problem, and hopefully we'll see a fix.
Eventually.
Oh, many of the CSM know of the problems with POS. I run one for manufacturing. And it's a pain to do some things.
As you'll see from the minutes, POS are being worked on
Woo! CSM 9!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4693
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 17:07:41 -
[11] - Quote
POS haven't been forgotten.
They're on the schedule to be looked at.
(I run a large POS. I'm not forgetting about this.)
Woo! CSM 9!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4760
|
Posted - 2015.01.23 14:23:06 -
[12] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:POS haven't been forgotten.
They're on the schedule to be looked at.
(I run a large POS. I'm not forgetting about this.) Oh Steve that has to be one of the funniest statements I have ever heard. They like corporate roles have been on schedule to be looked at for, hell so long it really does not matter any more. There have been so many times that it has been promised to be fixed, CCP makes politicians sound honest. Lets be blunt, it will never happen, they will talk and talk and talk, oh and then they will promise, then explain why they have to break that promise and then talk and talk and talk some more. And just like the creation of this thread shows, when it comes to breaking the promise CCP will use the CSM as a bus road bump.
Something to remember:
I'm not PR for CCP. I have a better idea of what CCP is working on than a regular player.
Woo! CSM 9!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5057
|
Posted - 2015.03.21 19:39:25 -
[13] - Quote
Celly S wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/back-into-the-structure/
^^ I also like what I'm seeing here too ^^
My response to seeing the devblog was 'ship it'
There are some more details to work out, but it looks good to me.
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5383
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 16:14:18 -
[14] - Quote
With what I've seen so far, I'm cautiously optimistic.
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5467
|
Posted - 2015.07.28 12:00:22 -
[15] - Quote
Arielle Silverwing wrote:Seems to me that they should be sharing some information with us about what's being worked on, and what timeline they have in mind for the release, but, I haven't seen or heard much since the "coming soon" post.
even just someone from CCP popping in here and throwing us a bone would be nice.
tks AS
http://now.eveonline.com/post/125176261953/construction-of-the-first-medium-class-citadel-is
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5468
|
Posted - 2015.07.30 11:20:26 -
[16] - Quote
By now, they've also shared the concept art for the large and the XL
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5681
|
Posted - 2015.10.25 01:37:54 -
[17] - Quote
Santa Spirit wrote:POS Bump
so all this cool stuff coming, carrier changes, jump fatigue changes, new capital modules, new ships and FINALLY new posse... oh wait.... my bad.
Sorry Celly, I tried hun. Santa
There was a structure presentation? finished about an hour ago? and it was on the schedule?
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
|
|
|